Skip to content

 Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings

Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.  

There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:

General Clarifications

These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or 
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.

Project Specific Clarifications

These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special 
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building. 

Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to 
explain why and how it applies. You can access the online Technical Question form here

Technical Question Title Tool Version Date Released Credit Name Sub-credit Name TC Link
Integrated Public Art DABv1 July 2021 29 - Innovation Global Sustainability
Approved Ruling:

There are 2 pathways available for project teams to target the ‘Integrated Public Art’ Credit from the DGNB CORE 2014 rating tool under 'Global Sustainability'.

 

Pathway 1: DGNB certification

The project has achieved this credit in an associated DGNB certification.

Documentation Requirements:

  • A copy of this TC.
  • A copy of the results from DGNB showing that this credit has been achieved.

 

Pathway 2: No DGNB certification available

Project teams may target one (1) point under 30 E - Global Sustainability by demonstrating compliance with the criteria SOC 3.2 "Integration of Public Art" from the DGNB CORE 2014 rating tool.

To target the point, a total minimum of 60 checklist points (CLP) must be achieved across the 4 evaluation criteria. The GBCA notes that partial points are not applicable for this initiative.

In order to assist the assessor(s) with their assessment, the project team is required to justify how they comply with the DGNB criteria.

Documentation Requirements:

  • A copy of this response.
  • A short report describing (at a minimum):
    • The number of CLP achieved per evaluation criteria. The 4 evaluation criteria are:
    • Funding
    • Procurement
    • Awareness-raising
    • Alternative: Minimum public art requirement
    • How the project has achieved the CLPs claimed for the above categories. This includes a description of the artwork, and the initiatives undertaken and implemented.
  • Supporting documentation to evidence the claims above. This could include, but is not limited to:
    • Media announcements
    • Artist statements
    • Individual CVs
    • Tour itineraries
    • Exhibition or tour booklets

 

The NZGBC provides the following interpretation of the requirements of the DGNB evaluation criteria to aid the project team and assessor(s):

  • Procurement
    • "Art expert" is interpreted to mean an individual suitably qualified and experienced to provide art critique.
    • "cooperation" is interpreted to mean meetings and/or workshops.
    • "art competition" is interpreted to mean a public competition process in line with local, state or national competition guidelines.
    • "appropriate selection process" is interpreted to mean with a panel of judges
    • "Young artist" is interpreted to mean an individual under the age of 35.
  • Awareness-raising
    • "publications" may be interpreted as online or print media
    • "labelling" must be a physical plaque or similar on-site label.

For design assessment, if evidence of implementation is not available, commitment-style documentation may be more appropriate, provided it sufficiently details how the CLP will be achieved.