Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings
Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.
There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:
General Clarifications
These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.
Project Specific Clarifications
These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building.
Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to
explain why and how it applies. You can download the Technical Question form here
Technical Question Title | Tool Version | Date Released | Credit Name | Sub-credit Name | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCA Practitioners | DABv1 | December 2020 | 19 - Life Cycle Assessment/Impacts | Life Cycle Assessment | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The current LCA credit requires both LCA producers and peer reviewers to be LCA practitioners who should be either: A) An individual or organisation who have produced, co-produced and/or independently peer reviewed at least five LCA studies in the past three years; or B) A person who is qualified as an “LCA Certified Practitioner” (LCACP) through ALCAS / LCANZ / ACLCA. Since many high quality LCA software options are available in the NZ market, many LCAs are being created using such software by a person who is not an LCA practitioner. In this case, as long as the peer review is conducted by a person that fulfils the above requirements, it will be deemed compliant with this requirement |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reporting Accuracy | DABv1, INTv1 | February 2020 | 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste | Reporting Accuracy | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The new Design and As-Built and Interiors tool, Construction and Demolition waste credit (Credit 22) has a minimum requirement that must be met BEFORE the other credits can be approved. The “Reporting Accuracy" credit criteria states the following: The minimum requirement is met where the waste contractors and waste processing facilities servicing the project demonstrate compliance with the Green Star Construction and Demolition Waste Reporting Criteria.” Construction and Demolition Waste Reporting Criteria Where waste contractors or waste processing facilities do not hold a ‘Compliance Verification Summary’ (as explained in the credit criteria) they shall, at a minimum, disclose to the project team how much of the Reporting Criteria has been implemented. The 'Disclosure Statement' will take place of the ‘Compliance Verification Summary’ in the project team's submission. They can be found here: https://new.gbca.org.au/construction-and-demolition-waste/ It is expected waste contractors or waste processing facilities will fill out the form in good faith and will show how they will be fully compliant with the Criteria within 12 months. If the waste contractors or waste processing facilities does not provide evidence of complying with the criteria or how the outstanding requirements will be complied within this timeline, the credit will not be awarded. Waste contractors and waste processing facilities are given the 12 month implementation period only once. A simplified line diagram of the Criteria is attached. All effected parties are strongly encouraged to read the Criteria document. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Humidity Control - Small Fitouts | INTv1 | March 2020 | 13 - Thermal Comfort | Thermal Comfort | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Projects qualifying as “small fitouts” in accordance with the submission guidelines are able to claim the humidity requirement (point two) of Credit 13.1 as ‘Not Applicable’ when achieving compliance through the prescriptive approach, where the base building services do not provide humidity control |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stormwater Pollution Targets | DABv1 | November 2020 | 25 - Stormwater | Stormwater Pollution Targets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: It is agreed that the proper interpretation of “Untreated runoff” means the run-off from the completed development to the same design location and use as proposed with no design measures to reduce pollution |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operational Waste | DABv1, INTv1 | March 2020 | 8 - Operational Waste | Prescriptive Pathway: Facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: NZGBC confirms that it is not a requirement of the Prescriptive Pathway (8B) that the project implement an Operational Waste Management Plan (OWMP) or engage a waste auditor. The project team may use the updated documentation recommendations: Submission Template Site Plan and/or Architectural Plans — highlighting all relevant areas as referenced by the WMP, and demonstrating: B.1 Separation of Waste Streams; B.2 Dedicated Waste Storage Area; and B.3 Access to Waste Storage Area. B.1- Equipment list/schedule demonstrating that waste streams provided are met through adequate bins B.2- Calculations in regards to waste generation and bin sizing and reference to how these figures meet third party best practice guidelines e.g. The City of Sydney’s Policy for Waste Minimisation in New Developments 2005 B.3- Description of how waste collection areas adhere to best practices, as outlined within third-party best practice guidelines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clarification of Credit 25.2 - Stormwater and Pollution | DABv1 | April 2020 | 25 - Stormwater | Stormwater Pollution Targets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The credit introduction states “25.2 STORMWATER POLLUTION TARGETS Where criterion 25.1 has been achieved, one (1) additional point is awarded where it is demonstrated that all stormwater discharged from the site meets the required pollution reduction targets for the identified contaminants of concern when compared to untreated runoff in accordance with the following requirements.” Table 25.1 Pollution Reduction Targets lists several pollutants including Zinc and Copper. It has been determined that if a project team can provide evidence as to why the building and its associated site will not generate these pollutants they are not required to include them in the model. For example, if it can be shown that a steel roof has been appropriately coated to remove the likelihood of zinc runoff than the project would not need to include Dissolved Zinc in the model. Please submit a TQ to NZGBC with supporting documentation if this is to be pursued. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Potable Water - Fixtures and Fittings exclusions | DABv1, INTv1 | March 2020 | 18 - Potable Water | Sanitary Fixture Efficiency | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: For the purposes of the Potable water credit 18B.1, the following fixtures and fittings may be excluded, as the water consumption will not be altered significantly by reducing the water flow: Bath taps, laboratory taps, and taps dedicated to cleaning and facility management. Kitchen or café tap ware, where the primary use is for pot fill and container filling. Kitchen/ Café Chilled, Boiling and Sparkling tap ware which are used to fill cups |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percentage benchmark - Construction and Demolition Waste | DABv1, INTv1 | April 2020 | 29 - Innovation | Improving on Green Star Benchmarks - Construction and Demolition Waste | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: In the Appendix for Non-Innovation claims, the Submission Guidelines state that improving on the benchmark for Construction and Demolition Waste: Percentage Benchmark will not be awarded an Innovation. This is contradictory and incorrect. The Innovation point is available to be awarded. The last line of the Submission Guidelines regarding Construction and Demolition Waste: Percentage Benchmark can be ignored. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fire System Test Water | DABv1 | June 2020 | 18 - Potable Water | Fire System Test Water | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The point states the following: “18B.5 Fire Protection System Test Water One (1) point is awarded when one of the following conditions is met: • The fire protection system does not expel water for testing; or • When sprinkler systems are installed, each floor must be fitted with isolation valves or shut-off points for floor-by-floor testing.” The aim of this credit is “To encourage building design that minimises potable water consumption in operations.” For the fire protection system test water point It is only applicable to situations where the building and environment benefit from having additional valves or other systems in place which reduce the amount of water used. A single-storey building does not achieve the second criteria above (shut-off points for floor-by-floor testing) by default and nor can they be awarded NA. Teams would need to demonstrate how their project would minimize water use during fire protection system test/maintenance to achieve this credit. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy Use Calculations - Lighting | DABv1 | July 2020 | 6 - Metering and Monitoring | Metering | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: An alternative proposed method of determining the energy use of the lighting at each floor through calculations rather than meters is accepted, provided that all power uses are metered and compliant with the Submission Guideline requirements. Where floors have multiple tenancies or specialist lighting systems then these must be metered as per the Submission Guidelines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Crushed concrete credits 19, 21 and 22 | DABv1, DABv1.1 | August 2022 | 29 - Innovation | Innovation | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Crushed concrete from a previous building on the same site directly reused (without being taken out from the site) for hardfill or backfill may claim points under credit 22 Construction and Demolition Waste, credit 19 Life Cycle Impacts and credit 21 Sustainable Products simultaneously, but not under the innovation category. Note that the project team should ensure the quality of the crushed concrete is suitably consistent as being reused for hardfill or backfill. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Eligible project definition Design & As Built | DABv1, INTv1 | November 2020 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The current definition for Eligible Project in the section of Glossary refers to the NCC (the Australian Building Code) usage classification. As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the definition is amended as below: “Eligible Project - Any New Zealand-based new build or major refurbishment project of any eligible typology (see above for NCC Building usage classifications and relevant New Zealand Building Code Clause A1 Classified Uses), with a minimum occupancy of 1FTE, and meeting all other eligibility criteria available on the NZGBC website, may target a Green Star NZ – Design & As-built Certified Rating using the Submission Guidelines and this Addendum Document as guidance.” |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Active Transport Facilities Design & As Built NZv1.0 | DABv1 | July 2020 | 17 - Sustainable Transport | Active Transport Facilities | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Credit 17.4 Active Transport Facilities in Green Star Design & As-Built has been updated
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Light Pollution to Neighbouring Bodies | DABv1, INTv1 | October 2019 | 26 - Light Pollution | Light Pollution to Neighbouring Bodies | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: For criterion 26.1 Light Pollution to Neighbouring Bodies, values from Table 2.1 of AS 4282:1997 rather than Table 2.2 should be applied for : • For Class 2 buildings (residential), the values in Columns 5A and B; or • For Class 3 to 9 buildings (non-residential), the values in Column 3.C. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Qualified Acoustic Consultant | DABv1, INTv1 | May 2019 | 10 - Acoustic Comfort | Acoustic Comfort | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: A Qualified acoustic consultant should be a member of the Acoustical Society of New Zealand or equivalent international recognised body, or a qualified staff member within an Association of Australasian Acoustical Consultants (AAAC) member firm. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Energy Model Reference | DABv1.1 | May 2024 | 15 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions | Greenhouse Gas Emissions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: There is an inconsistency in the GHG Calculation Guide v1.1. A Reference Project is defined as: “A hypothetical building of the same size, shape, floor area and glazing areas as the Proposed Project, but whose building fabric and building services characteristics are based predominantly on the Deemed-to-Satisfy provisions as defined in this document.” Table 1 defines the Reference buildings as “… Glazing window to wall ratio (WWR) shall equal 50% of the above grade perimeter external wall area of conditioned spaces…” The glazing areas may differ between the Reference and Proposed projects as per Table 1 Section 7 of the General Modelling Criteria. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daylight - Supermarkets | DABv1, INTv1 | March 2020 | 12 - Visual Comfort | Daylight | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Daylighting is feasible in Supermarkets as demonstrated through numerous case studies. Therefore, supermarket projects cannot claim “Not Applicable” for credit 12.2. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Built Streamlining | DABv1, INTv1 | October 2020 | 0 - General | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: If a project has been awarded points under a Green Star NZ Design review rating, the project team may demonstrate Built compliance by confirming that the building has been constructed as per the information submitted and certified under the Design review rating in the place of full documentation. Should a project wish to do built-streamlining, a TQ needs to be submitted to the NZGBC in order to propose and confirm credits and points that are eligible for built streamlining. A signed statement confirming the project has been constructed with no significant changes that would affect compliance with the credit criteria. Note that where the submission guidelines recommend evidence to demonstrate that systems have been commissioned and installed as intended, a commissioning report (or similar) would be still be required as part of the Built submission or TQ. The purpose of the signed statements is NOT to remove the requirement for project teams to produce documentation, but rather to stop project teams having to spend additional time and resources on the collation of the as-built documentation into a Green Star submission. Note: should there be any changes in design or material that would impact the results of the original assessment, full built documentation must be provided. If the project team would like to target additional points which were not achieved at Design stage, full built documentation must be provided for the additional points. The NZGBC Assessors reserve the right to request built documentation where they deem the difference between Design and Built stage to be substantive |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Climate Zones | DABv1, INTv1 | November 2020 | 14 - Thermal Comfort | Thermal Comfort | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The current clause regarding applicable climate zones for Prescriptive Thermal Comfort Requirements refers to NCC (the Australian Building Code) Climate Zones. As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the following amended clause will replace the original clause on page 148 for Design and As Built and page 126 for Interiors. “This option can be applied in climate zones 1-3, as identified on the climate zone map in NZS 4243.1:2007 Figure A1 – Climate Zones, except for the following regions which are required to demonstrate compliance via thermal modelling: • The central plateau of the north island • Queenstown lakes, Mackenzie, Western Waitaki, Central Otago” |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sustainable Transport Calculator | DABv1, INTv1 | October 2019 | 17 - Sustainable Transport | Sustainable Transport | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: A correction to the example calculation for Number of services for each route in the Transport Calculator Guide for v3, Design & As Built NZv1.0 and Interiors v1.0. Number of morning peak services = 4 (3 services ≤ 15minutes, 15minutes < 1 service ≤ 30minutes) Number of afternoon peak services = 10 (9 services ≤ 15 minutes, 15minutes < 1 service ≤ 30minutes) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit 9.2 Provision of Outdoor Air - standards | DABv1, INTv1 | January 2021 | 9 - Indoor Air Quality | Provision of Outdoor Air | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Despite the difference between NZS4303:1990 and AS1668.4:2012 and the intentional preclusion of AS 1668.2 in New Zealand Building Code with regards to provision of outdoor air, Green Star still recognises both standards as valid references for calculating achievement of criteria 9.2 Provision of Outdoor Air. This is because Green Star rewards points for a rate 50% and 100% greater than the minimum required by these standards rather than policing on code compliance. Recognising both standards does not conflict with building code conformance however brings more flexibility to project teams. The responsibility for minimum code compliance rests with the designer and is governed by existing regulatory bodies, while the intent of the tool is to improve outdoor air rates over minimum requirements. In view of the above, we are clarifying that when the section for 9.2A Comparison to Industry Standards only refers to the AS 1668.2:2012, it should read "the recognised standards listed in 9.2.3". |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Peak Electricity Demand Reduction | DABv1, INTv1 | November 2020 | 16 - Peak Electricity Demand Reduction | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The current definition for Mixed Use Projects set in credit 16 Peak Electricity Demand Reduction refers to the NCC (the Australian Building Code) usage classification. As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the definition is amended as below: “A mixed-use project or building is deemed to be a building in which no single New Zealand Building Code Clause A1 Classified Use accounts for more than 80% of the building gross floor area (GFA), excluding car parks, etc.” |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Test Protocol for Formaldehyde Emissions | DABv1, INTv1 | November 2019 | 13 - Indoor Pollutants | Engineering Wood Products | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The EN 717-2 (DIN EN 717-2) test protocol for formaldehyde emission limit values, referenced in the Indoor Pollutants - Engineered Wood Products criterion of the Submission Guidelines, has been superseded by ISO 12460-3:2015 Project teams may, therefore, use the updated standard in determining formaldehyde emission test limits for wood-based panels to demonstrating compliance with the criterion. The emission unit of measurement remains unchanged. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supermarket Noise | DABv1, INTv1 | March 2020 | 10 - Acoustic Comfort | Reverberation | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: A supermarket would not be defined as a noise sensitive space. Therefore, Note 3 of Table AS/NZ 2107:2016 does not apply to this project. Stock cannot be taken into account in reverberation time calculations. It is accepted that credit 10.2 can be Not Applicable for the supermarket shop area of the store, but not for the other more standard spaces such as offices and staff rooms. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Views | DABv1, INTv1 | November 2020 | 12 - Visual Comfort | Views | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: For projects like supermarkets, to receive this credit, views will have to be made available to employees working in areas where staff would be expected to work for extended periods such as checkouts, deli counters and the like. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Supermarkets - Lighting Credits | DABv1, INTv1 | September 2021 | 11 - Lighting Comfort | General Illuminance and Glare Reduction, Surface Illuminance, Localised Lighting Control | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: It is agreed that for the retail section of the supermarkets, the requirements of credits 11.2, 11.3, and 11.4 do not need to be applied. The more standard spaces, such as offices and staff rooms, would still need to comply with these credits to achieve the points. When this exemption leads to the assessable area being less than 5% of the building, project teams should claim ‘Not Applicable’ for these criteria. The NZGBC considers the outcome of making these criteria ‘Not Applicable’ a more accurate reflection than awarding the point for a compliant area of less than 5% of the building. Where the nominated area is more than 5% of the gross floor area, or more than 1000sqm, the space is subject to credit requirements. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green Building Summary Sheets | DABv1, INTv1 | June 2019 | 0 - General, 21 - Sustainable Products | General | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Green Building Summary Sheets from EnviroSpec can be used in place of product data sheets, product certificates and manufacturer statements as valid supporting evidence to demonstrate compliance for products and materials. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Walkable Neighbourhoods | DABv1, DABv1.1 | September 2022 | 17 - Sustainable Transport | Walkable Neighbourhood | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: To confirm amenities are within 400m or 800m of the project, the site plan should show the measured walking distance (instead of the radial distance) from the centre of the project following a designated path to the amenity to meet the credit requirement. Note: The name of the criterion is Walkable Neighbourhoods. Its intent is to show that the amenity can be reached within a walkable distance (400-800m). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Producer Statements | DABv1 | June 2022 | 14 - Thermal Comfort, 15 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions, 16 - Peak Electricity Demand Reduction | Thermal Comfort, Peak Electricity Demand Reduction, Greenhouse Gas Emissions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Accredited Energy Modellers can use a producer statement instead of a full energy modelling report to demonstrate compliance for credit 14 Thermal Comfort,15 Greenhouse Gas Emissions and 16 Peak Electricity Demand Reduction. Note that the associated submission templates and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Calculator will still need to be submitted. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Intumescent paint | DABv1, INTv1 | April 2019 | 13 - Indoor Pollutants | Paints, Adhesives, Sealants and Carpets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The NZGBC acknowledges that the application of intumescent paint prior to weatherproofing may reduce the exposure of VOCs on a project however this is not sufficient reason for the paint to be excluded from this credit. The intent of credit 13.1 Paints, Adhesives, and Sealants is to reward project teams that demonstrate; |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Independent Commissioning Agent | DABv1, INTv1 | November 2019 | 2 - Commissioning and Tuning | Independent Commissioning Agent | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: NZGBC would expect that an Independent Commissioning Agent (ICA) will have been appointed to advise, monitor, and verify the commissioning and tuning of the nominated building systems (at the very latest) from the beginning of the detailed design phase/ end of developed design phase onwards and through tender, construction, commissioning and tuning phases. This will allow the ICA to understand the design and make suggestions without overly complicating the agreed concept, preliminary and initial developed design phases. However, there is nothing to prevent the ICA from being engaged even earlier to ensure any potential issues are highlighted as soon as possible. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Compliance Verification Summary | DABv1 | July 2020 | 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste | Reporting Accuracy | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Where waste contractors or waste processing facilities do not hold a ‘Compliance Verification Summary’ (as explained in the credit criteria) they shall, at a minimum, disclose to the project team how much of the Reporting Criteria has been implemented. The 'Disclosure Statement' will take place of the ‘Compliance Verification Summary’ in the project team's submission. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contamination and Hazardous Material | DABv1 | June 2019 | 24 - Sustainable Sites | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: To be eligible for these points, the site should be initially precluded by either the NES (National Environmental Standard) or the regional authority rules for its intended use before the best practice remediation takes place. Supporting evidence needs to clearly document the contamination present on the site and confirm which rules or standards precluded this development for the intended use prior to remediation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
12.3 - Views | DABv1, INTv1 | May 2019 | 12 - Visual Comfort | Views | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The external 8 meters sight line is required to be entirely within the legal site boundary of project and/or open public spaces and cannot extend into adjacent sites. For precinct developments, the compliance of this credit will be assessed on a case by case basis. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reference project definition | DABv1, INTv1 | December 2020 | 0 - General | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The definition for Reference Projects is amended as below: A hypothetical building of the same size, shape and floor area and glazing areas as the Proposed Building, but whose building fabric and building services characteristics are based predominantly on the Deemed-to-Satisfy provisions as defined in this document. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
DHW losses | DABv1, INTv1 | January 2021 | 16 - Peak Electricity Demand Reduction, 15 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions | Greenhouse Gas Emissions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Standing losses factor(fstanding) and distribution losses factor (fdistribution) of Domestic Hot Water (DHW) systems, as mentioned in the Green Star Energy Consumption and Green House Gas Emissions Calculation Guide, should be determined based on the DWH system design (system type, storage volumes, distribution lengths, design temperatures, level of insulation etc.) and engineering judgement. Manufacturers may have the expected standing losses available. Alternatively, for straightforward typical systems, the following resources may provide a suitable reference: • AS/NZS 4692.1:2005 Electric water heaters – Energy consumption, performance and general requirements • AS/NZS 4692.2:2005 Electric water heaters Minimum Energy Performance Standard (MEPS) requirements and energy labelling • https://reg.energyrating.gov.au/comparator/product_types/ |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fire Protection Test Water | DABv1 | November 2020 | 18 - Potable Water | Fire System Test Water | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The current clause regarding projects that are deemed not applicable under the Fire Protection System Test Water criterion (18B.5) refers to Part E of the NCC (the Australian Building Code) on page 188 for Design and As Built. As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the following amended clause will replace the original clause: “The Fire Protection System Test Water criterion (18B.5) is deemed ‘Not Applicable’ for projects where: • A sprinkler system is not required under The New Zealand Building Code, or • A sprinkler system is not provided by the project team, and does not include a water-based fire protection system.” |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Credit 15 and 16 Warehouse modelling | DABv1 | April 2022 | 15 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions | Greenhouse Gas Emissions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: We are issuing this clarification as we note that there is an error in the wording of the GHG Emissions Calculation Guide, where under table 26 HVAC and simulation parameters the guidance states that: “The reference project must operate within the temperature range 18 to 26°C for at least 98% of plant operating hours. Where the design temperature range is within this range, the Reference project shall use the same control band as the Proposed project where the design temperature range is outside of this range, the Reference project shall use lower and supper temperature control limits of 18 and 26°C respectively, as appropriate” We note that the guidance is not specifically clear for mechanically ventilated warehouse spaces and increases the Reference building energy consumption unfairly. To clarify the Reference Project must achieve the same space temperature conditions as the proposed project for greater than 98% of occupied hours. Alternatively, the analysis can be undertaken on the basis of both the Proposed and Reference Project achieving a PMV of between -1 and 1 for 98% of occupied hours across 95% of the floor area. (The intent of this requirement is that the Reference Project generally achieves the same level of service as the Proposed Project) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Green Star submission additional guidance | DABv1, INTv1 | December 2020 | 0 - General, 1 - Green Star Accredited Professional | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Here are some extra guidelines for a better Green Star documentation: 1.Even though credit templates seem to allow hyperlinks to be included, we encourage you to NOT use any hyperlinks in the submission as they sometimes break after the submission is shared between GSAPs, NZGBC, and Assessors and they may also incur issues on cybersecurity if they are linked to a cloud server. 2.We encourage you to provide all the evidence in PDFs (except calculators) and each credit should stand on its own with the associated documents. Previous assessments have shown the disadvantage of cross-referencing documents in submissions. 3. Highlights and mark-ups are recommended as better ways to present documentation, which will eliminate chances to do further clarifications. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heat Rejection - Potable Water Reduction | DABv1 | November 2019 | 18 - Potable Water, 27 - Microbial Control | Heat Rejection | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: For credit 18B.3 Heat Rejection a 90% reduction in the potable water used for heat rejection meets the credit aim. Evidence of 90% or greater potable water saving with a wet/dry cooler should be provided in order to be awarded 2 points via the prescriptive pathway. This could take the form of a manufacturer-provided calculation for the specified equipment in the project climate zone (using NIWA data). As this would need to be done as part of showing the savings this shouldn’t be an additional calculation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
REBRI standard | DABv1, INTv1 | December 2020 | 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste | Construction and Demolition Waste, Reporting Accuracy | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Project teams can refer to the REBRI standard (as stated here https://www.branz.co.nz/sustainable-building/reducing-building-waste/assessing-waste/volume-weight/ ) to undertake volume to weight conversion, instead of using the table for Waste Volume to Weight Conversion Factors in the Submission Guidelines. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service Risers - ADF | DABv1, INTv1 | July 2020 | 0 - General, 13 - Indoor Pollutants | Indoor Pollutants, General | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Service risers should be entered into “Tertiary Spaces” part of the Area Definition form. Although these areas are non-habitable spaces, they should still be entered as a Tertiary Space, so they are captured under Credit 13 for Indoor Pollutants. This is because the requirement for Credit 13 is that all on site applications of paints, adhesives and sealants including both exposed and concealed applications are included in this credit. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Preliminary Design and Schematic Design | DABv1, INTv1 | December 2020 | 0 - General, 1 - Green Star Accredited Professional | Accredited Professional, General | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Where the credit refers to “Schematic Design”, this should read “Preliminary Design” which is the term more commonly used in New Zealand. It is noted that legacy rating tools require “Concept Design” as the required start point to engage with a Green Star Accredited Professional. With this clarification issued, a Green Star Accredited Professional will need to be engaged at the preliminary design stage. This change has been discussed and identified acceptable as it still fulfills the aim of the credit. However, the NZGBC still encourages project teams to involve Green Star Accredited Professionals as early as possible, ideally from the concept design stage, to eliminate risks in pursuing a Green Star rating. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
2.1 Environmental Performance Targets | DABv1, DABv1.1, Green Star Buildings NZ | May 2025 | 2 - Commissioning and Tuning, 3 - Verification and Handover | Environmental Performance targets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: TC for credit 2.1.1 Environmental Performance Targets (Design & As Built v1.1) and credit 3 Environmental Performance Targets and Information (Buildings): This credit requires the design team to define the environmental performance targets (EPT) for the project based on the design. As part of this, they must outline the operational and maintenance requirements specific to achieving the performance targets. Energy or water use are not just defined by the way the building and its systems are built, but by how those systems are operated and maintained.This document is expected to be initiated in the early stages of design. If the decision to target Green Star certification occurs late in design, then the EPT document should be prepared as soon as possible after that decision is confirmed. If the decision to target Green Star occurs after the design stage is complete the project team should submit an eligibility TQ to the NZGBC. This document is expected to be a live document during the design process, being finalised at the end of the design stage.
The document required for this credit is intended to be useful to the project and not just created for the purpose of achieving Green Star compliance. This should be considered when writing the document by the design team.
The purpose of the credit is to provide a record of the intent of the design (design narrative and rationale) and expected operational and maintenance requirements. It is also intended to show how the performance targets are metered and can be monitored. This record can then be used:
This document should not be made up of spec clauses as these do not describe the design intent required for the credit. Design parameters may be copied from the specs however, for example, the design conditions for the HVAC system.
The operational requirements in the document provided for this credit should include both automatic and manual control of the system, including efficient use. As an example of efficient use, for a lighting system:
The maintenance requirements in this document are expected to be outlined. They should include consideration of performance maintenance, not just preventative or routine maintenance requirements. Detailed maintenance procedures are not required only a list of maintenance activities, frequency, and troubleshooting. The purpose of recording this information in this document is to communicate to the building owner the extent of operations and maintenance requirements there will be for the selected systems.
An example is provided below.
For the targets, metering and monitoring part of the EPT documentation:
For DABv1.1 projects only:
Where a Monitoring Strategy is not available or inadequate (DABv1.1 only and only at design stage as per the above table) the EPT document should clearly include a sufficient description of the metering and monitoring approach. For example, including the metering diagram but also including an easy way for the reader to understand which meter relates to which set budget.
As an example, this could be presented in the following way:
Where CM3 and CM5 are the two meters in the building that read the HVAC energy use as identified on the meter diagram included in the document. Note that the meter numbers required in this table would be as identified on the meter diagram also provided in the document.
The breakdown of targets per system/use presented in the EPT should align with the metering breakdown. This allows these budgets to be confirmed in operation. Projects that meet the small buildings exception presented under credit 6 (DABv1.1) or credit 3 (Buildings) need only provide a single energy and single water target, rather than per system/use.
The monitoring information here is not expected to be as detailed as the TM39 monitoring strategy required for credit 6, but it should outline the process. For example, including the monitoring frequency, the process for rectification if a budget is being exceeded, who is responsible, regularity of reporting of environmental performance, and what gets reported to who.
For DABv1.1 and Buildings projects:
Fire, communication, IT, security and lift systems can be excluded from the EPT documentation.
Efficient use (DABv1.1) should detail how the automatic controls enable efficiency, but also how efficiency can be managed through manual control. Examples include:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
External Loading Dock Glare | DABv1, DABv1.1 | June 2024 | 12 - Visual Comfort | Glare reduction | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: The Guidance for Industrial Projects for DAB v1.0 and v1.1 includes "external loading dock areas" as Primary areas that are subject to the Glare Reduction credit requirements. Upon further industry consultation regarding the feasibility of meeting this requirement as well as the benefits to occupants, this requirement has been removed. External loading dock areas do not need to be included in this credit. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nominated Building Systems | DABv1, DABv1.1 | June 2024 | 2 - Commissioning and Tuning | Environmental Building Performance | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Nominated Building Systems: If the project team chooses not to include one of the systems listed in the Submission Guidelines, justification is to be provided why it has been excluded. The building envelope/façade does not need to be considered as part of the nominated building systems unless it includes an active component such as automated windows. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
IEQ and Nominated Systems | DABv1.1 | July 2024 | 2 - Commissioning and Tuning | Commissioning and Tuning, Conditional Requirement | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: For energy and water it is sufficient to set targets only for metered systems as per the requirements of Credit 6. IEQ includes thermal comfort, air quality, lighting and acoustics. It is not a requirement for all these metrics to be monitored using physical sensors. IEQ monitoring can be via occupant comfort survey targets, HVAC system maintenance targets, quarterly reporting of indoor air quality, thermal comfort, or lighting comfort performance measurements |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
18B.5 Fire Protection System | DABv1, DABv1.1 | October 2024 | 18 - Potable Water | Fire System Test Water | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Fire protection system test water is not limited to sprinklers only. Projects targeting Credit 18B.5 Fire Protection System Test Water from Green Star - Design & As Built should include water consumption calculations for each relevant system used during fire protection testing, such as sprinkler, hose reel and hydrant systems. The intent of the credit is to recognise reduced potable water consumption in major water uses in the building therefore the scope of the credit covers any system that uses water during fire protection testing. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stormwater Pollutants | DABv1, DABv1.1 | October 2024 | 25 - Stormwater | Stormwater Pollution Targets | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: Projects that capture Stormwater onsite may not infiltrate untreated water without the removal of pollutants in line with the pollution reduction targets outlined within the Credit 26 Stormwater for Green Star Design & As Built. In the case where it can be demonstrated that the pollutants will be reduced to the targets outlined in the Submission Guidelines without treatment when it enters any underground aquifers projects teams may target the requirement. For stormwater that is captured, used on site, and not discharged to the stormwater system, there remains a requirement to treat the pollutants in that stormwater beyond those required under the relevant legislation. NZGBC clarifies that the credit intent is to reduce pollutants entering the public stormwater infrastructure and other waterbodies. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submission guidelines | DABv1 | October 2019 | 0 - General | General | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amendment/Approved Ruling: All supported documentation listed for each credit in the Submission Guidelines are suggestions only, unless specified otherwise. Alternate documentation to those listed can be used by project teams to demonstrate credit compliance if it adequately supports the claims made within the Submission Templates. |