Skip to content

 Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings

Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.

There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:

General Clarifications

These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or 
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.

Project Specific Clarifications

These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special 
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building. 

Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to 
explain why and how it applies. You can download the Technical Question form here

Technical Question Title Tool Version Date Released Credit Name Sub-credit Name
Prescriptive Definitions for energy and water metering Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 3 - Verification and Handover
Approved Ruling:
There are no prescriptive definitions for common uses, major uses and major sources for energy and water metering defined in Green Star Buildings. Project teams should justify their definition in the submission.
 
The following guidance, adapted from Green Star - Design and As Built is provided to help project teams identify these uses and sources.
 
Metering is to be provided to allow for monitoring of the relevant areas or functions of the project. In most cases floor-by-floor metering will suffice if the entire floor has a single use. If a floor has multiple uses, the different uses shall be metered e.g. in a floor be composed of office space and a seminar room, both spaces shall be separately sub-metered. If a floor has multiple tenants or owners, each tenancy or property shall also be separately sub-metered.
 
Where an energy load for a single item exceeds 5% of the total energy use for the building, or 100kW, it should be independently metered. Supplementary equipment can also be installed on the same measured circuit as the major use item. However, the total combined energy use of any systems connected to the major use item should not contribute more than 10kVA to the overall energy use.
 
Where a common water use consumes 10% of the project’s water use, these should be independently metered.
 
The following examples are provided as guidance:
  • In office facilities, consideration should be given to the usage patterns of the building. Floor-by-floor sub-metering is appropriate if the entirety of the floor is an office area. If a floor has a significant component that differs from the principal use, for example a number seminar rooms, then this space should be sub-metered as well.
  • In retail facilities, consideration should be giving to separately meter staff only areas, such as warehousing or office area, from the retail areas and tenancies, and separately sub-metered from the back of house and central systems.
  • In an education building, the metering strategy should address the multiple uses in the facility. The kitchen, computer classrooms, auditoriums, gyms, swimming pool, laboratories, study rooms, classrooms and lecture halls all have different usage patterns. As such, the metering strategy should separately sub-meter those.
  • In residential buildings, an effective mechanism to monitor energy and water consumption data should allow for the reporting of daily usage data. ‘Smart Metering’ systems supplied to all units is an acceptable method of meeting the requirements for distinct uses.
  • In a building such as an industrial warehouse with a large floor plate, energy meters should be provided separately for lighting consumption, and other power consumption.
Project teams may install metering above and beyond the examples given above.
Decorative Lighting Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1, DABv1.1 May 2025 11 - Lighting Comfort General Illuminance and Glare Reduction, Minimum Lighting Comfort
Approved Ruling:
Projects may exclude decorative lighting from the following criteria where the decorative lighting is not the primary source of lighting in the room, and each regularly occupied area is supplied with a primary light source (e.g. downlights) that meets all criteria requirements:
  • Green Star - Design & As Built - Lighting Comfort: Minimum Lighting Comfort and General Illuminance and Glare Reduction
  • Green Star Buildings - Light Quality: Lighting Comfort and Glare from Light Sources
Location of Changing Facilities Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 27 - Movement and Place
Approved Ruling:
Changing Facilities (end of trip) may be provided on a different floor from bike storage if they are easily accessible and meet all other requirements.
End-of-trip facilities, including changing rooms, showers, and lockers, must be provided in a dedicated facility within easy access of the bike storage. This is to meet the credit intent to encourage occupants and users to use active, low carbon and public transport options instead of private vehicles.
 
Some examples of what can and can't be accepted:
Acceptable
  • Dedicated end-of-trip facilities on another floor, easily accessible by a short walk (not through high traffic areas) or elevator.
  • Dedicated end-of-trip facilities located outside of the building but within easy access. E.g. one end-of trip facility for a complex of buildings.
  • Lockers provided within end-of-trip facilities
Not Acceptable
  • Shower facilities on another floor or within tenancies, with access to them through high traffic areas, past tenancies, or though main part of building where lots of people are expected to be working or living.
  • Showers provided within other bathrooms that are there to meet statutory accessibility requirements.
  • Use of communal showers within a hotel/hostel environment, that customers and occupants use.
  • Lockers provided far away from changing facilities
Diverse Lead Teams Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 31 - Inclusive Construction Practices
Approved Ruling:
NZGBC clarifies that the intent of the requirement, 'empower a diverse lead team to manage these policies on-site' in the Inclusive Construction Practices credit in Green Star Buildings is to ensure that the on-site lead team are equipped to implement the discrimination, racism, and bullying policies appropriately.
 
Therefore, to demonstrate this, projects may show that the site leadership team is proactively implementing these policies on site. The make-up of the site leadership team is not required to be demonstrated to be diverse themselves but are shown to be able to enforce the policies appropriately.
Needs Analysis Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1, DABv1.1 May 2025 31 - Inclusive Construction Practices, 7 - Responsible Construction Practices Responsible Construction Practices, High Quality Staff Support
Approved Ruling:
The requirement for responsible parties to conduct a needs analysis has been waived if the physical and mental health programmes implemented are from the NZGBC suggested list.
However, if issues outside of the provided list are used, a needs analysis justifying the inclusion of the issue must be provided.
Additionally, two new issues have been added to the list of issues that may be considered include:
  • Financial literacy
  • Sustainable procurement
Meeting air tightness testing targets Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 3 - Verification and Handover
Approved Ruling:
Project teams failing to meet the air tightness targets set for the project when targeting the Verification and Handover credit from Green Star Buildings at the Certified stage still meet the requirements of the Minimum Expectation. For any testing conducted, documentation of deficiencies (including results below targets) should be distributed to the project team, included in the commissioning report, and signed off by the design team.
The intention of target setting is to ensure that air tightness is considered meaningfully in the project during design and construction and is properly integrated into the commissioning process. Project teams should ensure that targets set during this process are reasonable and relevant to the project design and its intended performance.
At the Certified stage, projects are to provide evidence of their performance against the set air tightness goals. Where these targets are not achieved, project teams are encouraged to communicate with the building owner and address any discrepancies as far as practically possible as part of the commissioning process and review the design to note any lessons learnt for future projects.
Please note that final air tightness test results should be incorporated into energy models as per Credit 22: Energy Use – Reference Building Pathway
Formaldehyde testing methods Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1, DABv1.1 June 2025 13 - Indoor Pollutants, 13 - Exposure to Toxins Indoor Pollutants
Approved Ruling:
Formaldehyde testing methods are updated to include those outlined in updated standards, including:
- AS/NZS 2269:2004, testing procedure AS/NZS 2098.11:2005 (R2016) Methods of test for veneer and plywood - Part 11: Determination of formaldehyde emissions for plywood.
- AS/NZS 4266.1:2017 and AS/NZS 4266.1:2017 Amd 1:2021.
 
LCA - GFA DABv1.1 July 2025 19 - Life Cycle Assessment/Impacts Life Cycle Impacts, Upfront Carbon Reduction – Absolute Pathway, Upfront Carbon Reduction – Reference Pathway
Approved Ruling:

For credit 19 in Design and As-Built v1.0 and v1.1, as well as Life Cycle Impacts and Upfront Carbon Emissions credits in Green Star Buildings, the definition of Gross Floor Area must be based on the New Zealand Property Institute Measurement for Rentable Areas. This means covered car-parks (included within the drip line of the building) must be included in the definition of GFA.

Air tightness Green Star Buildings NZ July 2025 3 - Verification and Handover Commissioning and Tuning
Approved Ruling:

The primary difference between ATTMA TSL2 Issue 1 and 2 is the change from being based on EN13829:2001 to ISO 9972 as well as Issue 2 improving the explanation of building envelope area, introducing co-pressurization for building extensions, adding clarity on test procedures (especially when multiple tubes are used in tall buildings). Issue 2 may be used in all cases. 

Third-party certification for Formaldehyde testing Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1.1, DABv1 July 2025 13 - Indoor Pollutants, 13 - Exposure to Toxins Engineering Wood Products
Approved Ruling:

A signed and current certificate from a JAS-ANZ accredited third-party certifier, stating that a product complies with the relevant AS/NZS standards in the submission guidelines and confirming test results meet E1, E0 or Super E0, is acceptable evidence of compliance with formaldehyde emission limits of plywood, particle board, MDF, and LVL.


The relevant standards are as follows:
Product & Standard(s)
Plywood - AS/NZS 2269:2004, AS/NZS 2269:2008, AS/NZS 2269:2012
Particle Board - AS/NZS 1859.1:2004, AS/NZS 1859.1:2017
Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) - AS/NZS 1859.2:2004, AS/NZS 1859.2:2017
Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) - AS/NZS 4357.4:2005

Custom welded sections for beams and columns Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1, DABv1.1 July 2025 19 - Life Cycle Assessment/Impacts, 21 - Upfront Carbon Emissions
Approved Ruling:
Custom welded sections for beams and columns spanning more than 30m can be assumed to be 100% sourced from domestic steel plate with an emission factor of 4,092 kg.CO2e/tonne in the reference building. This is in recognition of evidence supplied to NZGBC that custom made large span beams and columns are generally domestically sourced.
 
For clarity, the definition of the reference building for Warehouse type buildings may include portal frames over 30m and this large span steel would use this new emission factor.
Lighting Comfort Criteria Green Star Buildings NZ July 2025 11 - Light Quality Lighting Comfort
Approved Ruling:
Do the requirements under the Lighting Comfort criteria apply to all internal and external regularly occupied areas?
Yes. The Lighting Comfort criteria in Green Star Buildings apply to all regularly occupied spaces within the site boundary of the project for both internal and external lighting. Internal regularly occupied areas are to be defined per the Submission Guidelines. External regularly occupied areas are those that are regularly occupied when external lighting is required, e.g. outdoor dining areas that operate outside of daylight hours. External areas that are not regularly occupied during these times do not need to meet Lighting Comfort requirements.
Non-regularly occupied areas may be excluded from meeting the credit requirements. However, the NZGBC encourage project teams to install high-quality lighting in non-regularly occupied spaces where possible.
 
Can industrial projects and external areas target alternate lighting properties for Lighting Comfort? Yes. External spaces and internal warehouse spaces with high bay lighting in an industrial project may comply with the following alternate lighting requirement in the Lighting Comfort criteria under the Light Quality credit from Green Star Buildings:
  • Light sources may have a minimum Colour Rendering Index (CRI) of 80
  • Light sources may have a MacAdam Ellipse or Standard Deviation Colour Matching (SDCM) of 5 or lower
All other lighting properties should comply with the requirements outlined in the Lighting Comfort criteria in the Submission Guidelines.
Where the industrial building has regularly occupied office spaces, these office spaces must meet the credit requirements as per the Green Star Buildings Submission Guidelines.
Guidance for General and Technical Questions Green Star Buildings NZ, INTv1, DABv1, DABv1.1, INTv1.1 August 2025 0 - General General
Approved Ruling:

Do I need to submit a General Question or a Technical Question for my project?

General Question

General Questions are sent via email to greenstarnz@nzgbc.org.nz when you have a query that is general in nature. General Questions are intended to provide general assistance with the user experience of the Green Star rating tools.

General Questions may include queries relating to:

  • Navigating the NZGBC website
  • Finding project details.
  • Finding NZGBC resources (e.g., where to download Submission Guidelines or Leadership Challenges).

Note that General Questions are not technical in nature (i.e., do not relate to credits or rating tool requirements) and cannot be used as evidence in submissions. Questions that are technical in nature will be cancelled, and the submitter will be directed to resubmit as a Technical Question.

 

Technical Question

Technical Questions are submitted when you have a question that is technical in nature. This may include questions relating to:

  • Requiring clarification on an item within a credit or rating tool.
  • Confirming your interpretation of a credit
  • Proposing an alternative solution to the credit requirements.
  • Obtaining a response that you intend to use for a project or include in your Green Star submission.

Technical Questions should be project-specific and will be registered towards that project’s four complimentary Technical Questions unless discussed with the NZGBC.

Non-project-specific Technical Questions are generally free of charge, but may incur a fee at the discretion of the NZGBC. This may include questions relating to:

  • Fixing an error in the rating tools
  • Addressing missing/contradicting guidance, like a missing definition
  • Area Definitions

What information should be included in my Technical Question?

  • Reference the specific Submission Guidelines, including the category and credit, that requires clarification (Quote, page numbers and references of the Submission Guidelines). e.g. this question is about X credit, where it states "quote" pg#.
  • A clear explanation of what you would like clarified. This is usually in a question format, rather than a statement. e.g. what does X mean?
  • Where an alternative approach is being proposed, please clearly:
    • Explain the issue.
    • Outline your alternative proposed solution.
    • Short explanation to justify the alternative approach proposed.
    • Supporting documentation to justify the alternative approach.
  • It is recommended you provide the preferred outcome/answer using standard TQ wording.

What can be expected in the response to my Technical Question?

Responses typically include:

  • Confirmation of your interpretation, or an explanation if your interpretation is not correct.
  • Clarification or answer to your question.
  • Explanation of the requirements in the Submission Guidelines and what the project team needs to do.

What does a Technical Question NOT do?

  • A Technical Question does not award points or confirm the outcome of a credit. This will be determined by the Certified Assessor(s) at the time of assessment.
  • A Technical Question does not review the submission forms and evidence for credit compliance. This will be determined by the Certified Assessor(s) at the time of assessment.
  • A Technical Question does not allow assessment comments to be removed or changed. Projects seeking further clarification on assessment comments should submit a post-assessment round clarification

Tips

Before submitting a Technical Question, please ensure to:

  • Review the existing Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings Register.
  • Carefully read the relevant credit in the Submission Guidelines, including Guidance, in its entirety.
  • Review any associated calculator and calculator guide related to the question.
  • Include a clear question - what are you seeking clarification on?
  • Explain how you have interpreted the issue.
  • Be clear and concise.
  • Provide the preferred outcome in the TQ submission

 

For all other queries

Please refer to the below for contact details on all other queries:

For all other NZGBC enquiries, please get in touch with us via customerservices@nzgbc.org.nz

Further guidance on the scoring metrics for Market Transformation Green Star Buildings NZ August 2025 40 - Market Transformation Market Transformation
Approved Ruling:

Project teams may use the table below for further guidance on the scoring metrics under the Market Transformation credit from Green Star Buildings. It would be expected that the initiatives proposed under the Market Transformation credit would be rated highly in at least three categories and medium in the remaining two. 

 

The metrics are: 

  • Control of outcome: The initiative delivers a guaranteed outcome
  • Scale of impact: The scale of impact is significant. For example, the outcome may satisfy multiple UN Sustainable Development Goals
  • Transformation potential: The initiative has the potential to transform an industry or sector
  • Length of impact: The initiative delivers long-lasting impacts
  • Value generation: The initiative can deliver benefits to both stakeholders (e.g., building owner or occupants) as well as the general public

 

 

Control of outcome

Scale of impact

Transformation potential

Length of impact

Value generation

Low

Process

The project goes through a process to try to ensure the outcome is achieved, but there is no certainty.

Low

Addresses one SDG, no direct link to NZGBC Strategy, limited beneficiaries 

Precinct only

Benefits are only accrued to precinct occupants or precinct developer.

1 year

Benefits are felt from construction to around 5 years after practical completion 

Low

Credit is mostly standard practice for industry and expected by the market

Med

Influence

The project has the ability to influence an outcome. The greater the effort, the higher the likelihood of this being achieved. Somewhat certain. 

Medium

Addresses at least two SDGs, links to megatrends, and at least two beneficiaries

Surrounding Community

The benefits extend beyond the precinct, but are limited to the surrounding neighbourhood or precinct

5 years

Benefits are felt from about 5 years after practical completion to around 20 years

Medium

Credit outcomes are somewhat valued by stakeholders, particularly those looking to get a high Green Star score.

High

Direct

The project is directly responsible for achieving the outcome. Guaranteed certainty.

High

Addresses multiple SDGs, aligned with megatrends, and multiple beneficiaries

Market transformation

This market transformation claim plays a significant role in transforming an industry or sector 

20+ years

Benefits are felt for longer than 20 years

High

Credit outcome has broad benefits but is rarely sought after.

 

Credit Criteria for Structural and Reinforcing Steel DABv1.1, DABv1 October 2025 20 - Responsible Building Materials Structural and Reinforcing Steel
Approved Ruling:

Projects may choose an alternative compliance option instead of meeting the standard requirements of Credit 20.1: Structural & Reinforcing Steel by adhering to the following:

  • Steel-framed buildings: At least 60% (by cost) of all fabricated steel components must achieve a Responsible Products Value (RPV) of 10 or more.
  • Concrete-framed buildings: At least 60% (by mass) of all reinforcing bar and mesh must achieve an RPV of 10 or more.

Projects must still ensure that at least 95% of the building’s steel (by mass) is sourced from a Responsible Steel Maker.

RPVs can be calculated and evidenced using the Responsible Products Calculator available on the NZGBC website. For further guidance, refer to the Calculator’s Introduction tab and to Credit 6 in the Green Star Buildings NZ Submission Guidelines document.

Cleaning Ductwork Green Star Buildings NZ 10 - Clean Air Ventilation System Attributes
Approved Ruling:
Ductwork can be considered clean where construction management processes are in place to ensure that all new ductwork, or ductwork that has been recently cleaned, remains free of moisture and debris until occupation, this ductwork can be considered to be clean. This should be addressed within the relevant scope of the Environmental Management System (EMS) and/or Environmental Management Plan (EMP) criteria in the Responsible Construction Minimum Expectation
TVOC and Formaldehyde Level Sampling Points for Industrial Projects Green Star Buildings NZ September 2025 13 - Exposure to Toxins
Approved Ruling:

Industrial projects may use the following alternative approach for warehouse-type spaces to determine the number of sampling points required to meet the TVOC and Formaldehyde Levels criteria in Credit Achievement.

Floor area

Number of samples per floor

< 10,000 m2

3

For every additional 10,000 m2 thereafter

1 additional sampling point


The samples must be representative of where the occupants are likely to spend a majority of their time.

 

This approach applies to the total warehouse-type spaces, including spaces where paints and sealants are not used.

 

For office spaces in an industrial project, the number of samples is to be determined in accordance with the Submission Guidelines.

Intumescent Paint VOC Compliance DABv1, DABv1.1 September 2025 13 - Indoor Pollutants Paints, Adhesives, Sealants and Carpets
Approved Ruling:

Intumescent paints may be exempt from the VOC compliance requirements of 13.1 - Paints, Adhesives, Sealants, and Carpets, provided the contractor submits a plan outlining how application will not occur in fully enclosed areas.

Zero Carbon Action Plan Green Star Buildings NZ October 2025 23 - Energy Source
Approved Ruling:

A Zero Carbon Action Plan is no longer required as a Minimum Expectations for Credit 23 - Energy Source, for all building types, provided that the project:

  1. Is 100% fossil fuel free in operation, either via on-site renewable energy or grid supply.

Fossil fuels cannot be used on site for any domestic hot water, space heating or cooking under any circumstances, regardless of base build or tenant use. Fossil fuels for industrial processes may be excluded. Energy sources supplied to tenants, such as gas lines that result in fossil fuels being used on site are included in the credit scope and are therefore not permitted.

  1. Either of the following criteria is achieved in Credit 24:
  • Elimination of high-GWP refrigerants. Refrigerants with GWP of 10 or less may be considered compliant with the credit.

or

  • 100% of emissions from refrigerants are offset
Correction for the Responsible Product Value for product-specific EPDs Green Star Buildings NZ October 2025 6 - Responsible Structure, 7 - Responsible Envelope, 8 - Responsible Systems, 9 - Responsible Finishes
Approved Ruling:
The Responsible Product Value (RPV) for Product-specific EPDs has been increased from 5 points to 7.

Product-specific EPDs score in Carbon Emissions Disclosure (CA), Environmental Impact Disclosure (CA) and Environmental Impact Disclosure (HP), resulting in an RPV of 7.

Please see the Responsible Products Guidelines - Version A for criteria.

The Database has been updated to reflect this new score.