Skip to content

 Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings

Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.  

There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:

General Clarifications

These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or 
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.

Project Specific Clarifications

These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special 
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building. 

Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to 
explain why and how it applies. You can download the Technical Question form here

How to most efficiently use this page:

  1. Filter for the relevant tool version
  2. If known, use the credit name field to search for credit keywords or corresponding credit number - please note, this field will ONLY search the "Credit Name" field
  3. Use your CTRL+F to search keywords on the page
Technical Question Title Clarification Type Tool Version Month Released Credit Name Sub-credit Name Amendment/Approved Ruling
Thermally Treated Timber General DABv1 June 2021 29 - Innovation Innovation- Thermally treated timber

Thermally treated timber may be recognised through an innovation application for a large proportion of thermally treated timber used in a project.  

To target this innovation, project teams will need to define a percentage benchmark for the thermally treated timber used in construction. In order to define the benchmark, project teams are required to: 

• Describe briefly the assumptions behind the benchmark, and any process that was used to establish them.

• If existing data was used, or a literature review was performed, this must be included. If the assumptions rely on previous experience by the project team, including professional estimates, this must be stated.

• Describe the process being undertaken to ensure the defined benchmarks are being met.

• Demonstrate that the benchmarks were achieved in the project’s As Built submission. For some projects, this may be able to be demonstrated at Tender stage, for the project’s Design submission.

Definition for Eligible Project General DABv1 November 2020 0 - General General

The current definition for Eligible Project in the section of Glossary refers to the NCC (the Australian Building Code) usage classification.

As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the definition is amended as below:

“Eligible Project - Any New Zealand-based new build or major refurbishment project of any eligible typology (see above for NCC Building usage classifications and relevant New Zealand Building Code Clause A1 Classified Uses), with a minimum occupancy of 1FTE, and meeting all other eligibility criteria available on the NZGBC website, may target a Green Star NZ – Design & As-built Certified Rating using the Submission Guidelines and this Addendum Document as guidance.”

Global Sustainability General DABv1, DABv1.1 July 2024 29 - Innovation Global Sustainability

Can projects target the 6.1 Green Cleaning Policy credit from Green Star - Performance under the Innovation category?

Yes. Projects pursuing a certification under Green Star - Design & As Built, Green Star - Interiors may target credit 6.1 Green Cleaning Policy from Green Star - Performance v1.2 under the Global Sustainability credit.

One (1) point is available where all compliance requirements for credit 6.1 Green Cleaning Policy from the Green Star - Performance v1.2 submission guidelines are addressed. This is on the condition that the Green Cleaning Policy must be implemented for a minimum of 10 years.

Integrated Public Art General DABv1 July 2021 29 - Innovation Global Sustainability

There are 2 pathways available for project teams to target the credit ‘Integrated Public Art’ credit from the DGNB CORE 2014 rating tool under 'Global Sustainability'.

 

Pathway 1: DGNB certification

The project has achieved this credit in an associated DGNB certification.

Documentation Requirements:

•              A copy of this response.

•              A copy of the results from DGNB showing that this credit has been achieved.

 

Pathway 2: No DGNB certification available

Projects teams may target one (1) point under 30 E - Global Sustainability by demonstrating compliance with the criteria SOC 3.2 "Integration of Public Art" from the DGNB CORE 2014 rating tool.

To target the point, a total minimum of 60 checklist points (CLP) must be achieved across the 4 evaluation criteria. The GBCA notes that partial points are not applicable for this initiative.

In order to assist the assessor(s) with their assessment, the project team is required to justify how they comply with the DGNB criteria.

Documentation Requirements:

•              A copy of this response.

•              A short report describing (at a minimum):

o              the number of CLP achieved per evaluation criteria. The 4 evaluation criteria are:

              Funding

              Procurement

              Awareness-raising

              Alternative: Minimum public art requirement

o              how the project has achieved the CLPs claimed for the above categories. This includes a description of the artwork, and the initiatives undertaken and implemented.

•              Supporting documentation to evidence the claims above. This could include, but is not limited to:

o              media announcements

o              artist statements

o              individual CVs

o              tour itineraries

o              exhibition or tour booklets

 

The GBCA provides the following interpretation of the requirements of the DGNB evaluation criteria to aid the project team and assessor(s):

•              Procurement

o              "Art expert" is interpreted to mean an individual suitably qualified and experienced to provide art critique.

o              "cooperation" is interpreted to mean meetings and/or workshops.

o              "art competition" is interpreted to mean a public competition process in line with local, state or national competition guidelines.

o              "appropriate selection process" is interpreted to mean with a panel of judges

o              "Young artist" is interpreted to mean an individual under the age of 35.

•              Awareness-raising

o              "publications" may be interpreted as online or print media

o              "labelling" must be a physical plaque or similar on-site label.

For design assessment, if evidence of implementation is not available, commitment-style documentation may be more appropriate provided it sufficiently details how the CLP will be achieved.

 

Alternative to Demonstrate Idle and Standby Energy Performance General DABv1, DABv1.1 April 2023 15 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Projects may demonstrate compliance with the 'lift idle and standby energy' requirement from the Vertical Transportation criteria by demonstrating that the following energy saving features have been incorporated in the lift specification:

  • Energy efficient Gearless AC Machines with regenerative VVVF drives;
  • Low energy LED lighting;
  • Shutdown of non-essential lighting, screens, etc. when on standby; and
  • The lift idle and standby energy performance level is at least level 3 in accordance with ISO 25745-2

This guidance is based on industry feedback that most lifts cannot currently achieve performance level 1 in accordance with ISO 25746-2 for lift idle and standby energy.

Documentation Requirements:

Please provide the following in your submission:

  • Schedule identifying all vertical transportation systems installed in the building, and the manufacturer and model of each.
  • Extract(s) from the commissioning report demonstrating (through supporting evidence) that the vertical transportation systems have been commissioned and operate as intended by the design.
  • Documentation showing the lift idle and standby energy performance level is at least level 3 in accordance with ISO 25745-2
  • A copy of this TC.

 

Correction to Percentage Benchmark and Innovation General DABv1 July 2020 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste Percentage Benchmark

In the Appendix for Non-Innovation claims, the Submission Guidelines state that improving on the benchmark for Construction and Demolition Waste: Percentage Benchmark will not be awarded an Innovation. This is contradictory and incorrect. 

The Innovation point is available to be awarded. The last line of the Submission Guidelines regarding Construction and Demolition Waste: Percentage Benchmark can be ignored.   

Ducted Split System Fan Coil Units General DABv1 May 2022 9 - Indoor Air Quality Ventilation System Attributes

Are ducted split system fan coil units (DX split/VRF/VRV) required to provide access to both sides of fan coil units?

No, project teams do not have to provide access to both sides of coils for cleaning and maintenance purposes of such systems, provided the following conditions are met:

1. Design teams may provide access to the upstream side of fan coil units where the coils are protected by a filter rated at MERV 8 or higher and:

  • Provide heating only; or,
  • Provide cooling only with the coil assembly no more than 4 rows deep; or,
  • Provide dual heating/cooling with the coil assembly no more than 4 rows deep

and

2. For fan coil units or air handling units located within a ceiling void, in addition to the above criteria, the project team must fully demonstrate safe access for cleaning and maintenance. This may include:

  • Access panels in unit / ductwork is in close proximity to the coil to be cleaned.
  • Access panels in the ceiling below the unit is in close proximity to the unit / ductwork access panel.
  • The upstream surface of the coil must be accessible within 1m of the ceiling panel.
  • For projects where a wall-mounted unit is installed, the project team must demonstrate that access is provided to one side of the coil for cleaning and maintenance purposes. The project team must also demonstrate:
  • The filter system used can achieve the same outcome as MERV 8 filter and;
  • Coil assembly is no more than 4 rows deep.

Documentation Requirements:

Please provide the following in your submission:

  • Evidence that all moisture-producing and debris-catching components such as cooling coils, heating coils, humidifiers and filters in the air handling unit are able to be sufficiently cleaned and maintained through single sided access.
  • Section drawing demonstrating any ceiling units can be safely reached through the ceiling access panel.
  • Plan drawing showing 100% of the upstream surface of the coil is accessible within 1m of the ceiling panel, allowing for obstructions.
  • A copy of this response.
Outdoor Lighting General DABv1, DABv1.1 June 2024 26 - Light Pollution Light Pollution to Neighbouring Bodies

This ruling supersedes the TC published April 2022

The project team must demonstrate that all outdoor lighting on the project complies with values set up in Table 3.2 and Table 3.3 of AS/NZS 4282:2023 Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting. Project team should justify their choice of environmental zone as per Table 3.1 in AS/NZS 4282:2023.

Water Efficiency in Anti-Ligature Sanitary Fixtures General DABv1 November 2020 18 - Potable Water Sanitary Fixture Efficiency

Water efficiency should be incorporated into the anti-ligature sanitary fixtures. Pressure needs to be put onto manufacturers of the products to make water efficient products that suit the application to move the industry forward.

HVA Installation Not Complete General DABv1 November 2020 14 - Thermal Comfort Thermal Comfort

The current clause for credit 14 Thermal Comfort regarding Spaces where HVAC is not Fully Installed at Time of Submission refers to the NCC (the Australian Building Code) Section J.

As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the following amended clause will replace the original clause on page 150.

“Internal tenant loads including lighting and small power must be modelled using a notional fitout assuming the most energy intensive fitout allowable by the New Zealand Building Code Clause H1 Energy Efficiency and referenced New Zealand Standards (code compliance minima), or according to the lease agreement or tenant fitout guide.”