Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings
Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.
There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:
General Clarifications
These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.
Project Specific Clarifications
These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building.
Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to
explain why and how it applies. You can download the Technical Question form here
How to most efficiently use this page:
- Filter for the relevant tool version
- If known, use the credit name field to search for credit keywords or corresponding credit number - please note, this field will ONLY search the "Credit Name" field
- Use your CTRL+F to search keywords on the page
Technical Question Title | Clarification Type | Tool Version | Month Released | Credit Name | Sub-credit Name | Amendment/Approved Ruling | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thermally Treated Timber | General | DABv1 | June 2021 | 29 - Innovation | Innovation- Thermally treated timber |
Thermally treated timber may be recognised through an innovation application for a large proportion of thermally treated timber used in a project. To target this innovation, project teams will need to define a percentage benchmark for the thermally treated timber used in construction. In order to define the benchmark, project teams are required to: • Describe briefly the assumptions behind the benchmark, and any process that was used to establish them. • If existing data was used, or a literature review was performed, this must be included. If the assumptions rely on previous experience by the project team, including professional estimates, this must be stated. • Describe the process being undertaken to ensure the defined benchmarks are being met. • Demonstrate that the benchmarks were achieved in the project’s As Built submission. For some projects, this may be able to be demonstrated at Tender stage, for the project’s Design submission. |
|
Definition for Eligible Project | General | DABv1 | November 2020 | 0 - General | General |
The current definition for Eligible Project in the section of Glossary refers to the NCC (the Australian Building Code) usage classification. As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the definition is amended as below: “Eligible Project - Any New Zealand-based new build or major refurbishment project of any eligible typology (see above for NCC Building usage classifications and relevant New Zealand Building Code Clause A1 Classified Uses), with a minimum occupancy of 1FTE, and meeting all other eligibility criteria available on the NZGBC website, may target a Green Star NZ – Design & As-built Certified Rating using the Submission Guidelines and this Addendum Document as guidance.” |
|
Global Sustainability | General | DABv1, DABv1.1 | July 2024 | 29 - Innovation | Global Sustainability |
Can projects target the 6.1 Green Cleaning Policy credit from Green Star - Performance under the Innovation category? Yes. Projects pursuing a certification under Green Star - Design & As Built, Green Star - Interiors may target credit 6.1 Green Cleaning Policy from Green Star - Performance v1.2 under the Global Sustainability credit. One (1) point is available where all compliance requirements for credit 6.1 Green Cleaning Policy from the Green Star - Performance v1.2 submission guidelines are addressed. This is on the condition that the Green Cleaning Policy must be implemented for a minimum of 10 years. |
|
Integrated Public Art | General | DABv1 | July 2021 | 29 - Innovation | Global Sustainability |
|
|
Alternative to Demonstrate Idle and Standby Energy Performance | General | DABv1, DABv1.1 | April 2023 | 15 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions | Greenhouse Gas Emissions |
Projects may demonstrate compliance with the 'lift idle and standby energy' requirement from the Vertical Transportation criteria by demonstrating that the following energy saving features have been incorporated in the lift specification:
This guidance is based on industry feedback that most lifts cannot currently achieve performance level 1 in accordance with ISO 25746-2 for lift idle and standby energy. Documentation Requirements: Please provide the following in your submission:
|
|
Correction to Percentage Benchmark and Innovation | General | DABv1 | July 2020 | 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste | Percentage Benchmark |
In the Appendix for Non-Innovation claims, the Submission Guidelines state that improving on the benchmark for Construction and Demolition Waste: Percentage Benchmark will not be awarded an Innovation. This is contradictory and incorrect. The Innovation point is available to be awarded. The last line of the Submission Guidelines regarding Construction and Demolition Waste: Percentage Benchmark can be ignored. |
|
Ducted Split System Fan Coil Units | General | DABv1 | May 2022 | 9 - Indoor Air Quality | Ventilation System Attributes |
Are ducted split system fan coil units (DX split/VRF/VRV) required to provide access to both sides of fan coil units? No, project teams do not have to provide access to both sides of coils for cleaning and maintenance purposes of such systems, provided the following conditions are met: 1. Design teams may provide access to the upstream side of fan coil units where the coils are protected by a filter rated at MERV 8 or higher and:
and 2. For fan coil units or air handling units located within a ceiling void, in addition to the above criteria, the project team must fully demonstrate safe access for cleaning and maintenance. This may include:
Documentation Requirements: Please provide the following in your submission:
|
|
Outdoor Lighting | General | DABv1, DABv1.1 | June 2024 | 26 - Light Pollution | Light Pollution to Neighbouring Bodies |
This ruling supersedes the TC published April 2022 The project team must demonstrate that all outdoor lighting on the project complies with values set up in Table 3.2 and Table 3.3 of AS/NZS 4282:2023 Control of the obtrusive effects of outdoor lighting. Project team should justify their choice of environmental zone as per Table 3.1 in AS/NZS 4282:2023. |
|
Water Efficiency in Anti-Ligature Sanitary Fixtures | General | DABv1 | November 2020 | 18 - Potable Water | Sanitary Fixture Efficiency |
Water efficiency should be incorporated into the anti-ligature sanitary fixtures. Pressure needs to be put onto manufacturers of the products to make water efficient products that suit the application to move the industry forward. |
|
HVA Installation Not Complete | General | DABv1 | November 2020 | 14 - Thermal Comfort | Thermal Comfort |
The current clause for credit 14 Thermal Comfort regarding Spaces where HVAC is not Fully Installed at Time of Submission refers to the NCC (the Australian Building Code) Section J. As a clarification for New Zealand projects, the following amended clause will replace the original clause on page 150. “Internal tenant loads including lighting and small power must be modelled using a notional fitout assuming the most energy intensive fitout allowable by the New Zealand Building Code Clause H1 Energy Efficiency and referenced New Zealand Standards (code compliance minima), or according to the lease agreement or tenant fitout guide.” |