Skip to content

 Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings

Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.  

There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:

General Clarifications

These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or 
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.

Project Specific Clarifications

These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special 
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building. 

Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to 
explain why and how it applies. You can download the Technical Question form here

How to most efficiently use this page:

  1. Filter for the relevant tool version
  2. If known, use the credit name field to search for credit keywords or corresponding credit number - please note, this field will ONLY search the "Credit Name" field
  3. Use your CTRL+F to search keywords on the page
Technical Question Title Clarification Type Tool Version Month Released Credit Name Sub-credit Name Amendment/Approved Ruling
Prescriptive Definitions for energy and water metering Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 3 - Verification and Handover
There are no prescriptive definitions for common uses, major uses and major sources for energy and water metering defined in Green Star Buildings. Project teams should justify their definition in the submission.
 
The following guidance, adapted from Green Star - Design and As Built is provided to help project teams identify these uses and sources.
 
Metering is to be provided to allow for monitoring of the relevant areas or functions of the project. In most cases floor-by-floor metering will suffice if the entire floor has a single use. If a floor has multiple uses, the different uses shall be metered e.g. in a floor be composed of office space and a seminar room, both spaces shall be separately sub-metered. If a floor has multiple tenants or owners, each tenancy or property shall also be separately sub-metered.
 
Where an energy load for a single item exceeds 5% of the total energy use for the building, or 100kW, it should be independently metered. Supplementary equipment can also be installed on the same measured circuit as the major use item. However, the total combined energy use of any systems connected to the major use item should not contribute more than 10kVA to the overall energy use.
 
Where a common water use consumes 10% of the project’s water use, these should be independently metered.
 
The following examples are provided as guidance:
  • In office facilities, consideration should be given to the usage patterns of the building. Floor-by-floor sub-metering is appropriate if the entirety of the floor is an office area. If a floor has a significant component that differs from the principal use, for example a number seminar rooms, then this space should be sub-metered as well.
  • In retail facilities, consideration should be giving to separately meter staff only areas, such as warehousing or office area, from the retail areas and tenancies, and separately sub-metered from the back of house and central systems.
  • In an education building, the metering strategy should address the multiple uses in the facility. The kitchen, computer classrooms, auditoriums, gyms, swimming pool, laboratories, study rooms, classrooms and lecture halls all have different usage patterns. As such, the metering strategy should separately sub-meter those.
  • In residential buildings, an effective mechanism to monitor energy and water consumption data should allow for the reporting of daily usage data. ‘Smart Metering’ systems supplied to all units is an acceptable method of meeting the requirements for distinct uses.
  • In a building such as an industrial warehouse with a large floor plate, energy meters should be provided separately for lighting consumption, and other power consumption.
Project teams may install metering above and beyond the examples given above.
Decorative Lighting Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1, DABv1.1 May 2025 11 - Lighting Comfort General Illuminance and Glare Reduction, Minimum Lighting Comfort
Projects may exclude decorative lighting from the following criteria where the decorative lighting is not the primary source of lighting in the room, and each regularly occupied area is supplied with a primary light source (e.g. downlights) that meets all criteria requirements:
  • Green Star - Design & As Built - Lighting Comfort: Minimum Lighting Comfort and General Illuminance and Glare Reduction
  • Green Star Buildings - Light Quality: Lighting Comfort and Glare from Light Sources
Location of Changing Facilities Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 27 - Movement and Place
Changing Facilities (end of trip) may be provided on a different floor from bike storage if they are easily accessible and meet all other requirements.
End-of-trip facilities, including changing rooms, showers, and lockers, must be provided in a dedicated facility within easy access of the bike storage. This is to meet the credit intent to encourage occupants and users to use active, low carbon and public transport options instead of private vehicles.
 
Some examples of what can and can't be accepted:
Acceptable
  • Dedicated end-of-trip facilities on another floor, easily accessible by a short walk (not through high traffic areas) or elevator.
  • Dedicated end-of-trip facilities located outside of the building but within easy access. E.g. one end-of trip facility for a complex of buildings.
  • Lockers provided within end-of-trip facilities
Not Acceptable
  • Shower facilities on another floor or within tenancies, with access to them through high traffic areas, past tenancies, or though main part of building where lots of people are expected to be working or living.
  • Showers provided within other bathrooms that are there to meet statutory accessibility requirements.
  • Use of communal showers within a hotel/hostel environment, that customers and occupants use.
  • Lockers provided far away from changing facilities
Diverse Lead Teams Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 31 - Inclusive Construction Practices
NZGBC clarifies that the intent of the requirement, 'empower a diverse lead team to manage these policies on-site' in the Inclusive Construction Practices credit in Green Star Buildings is to ensure that the on-site lead team are equipped to implement the discrimination, racism, and bullying policies appropriately.
 
Therefore, to demonstrate this, projects may show that the site leadership team is proactively implementing these policies on site. The make-up of the site leadership team is not required to be demonstrated to be diverse themselves but are shown to be able to enforce the policies appropriately.
Needs Analysis Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1, DABv1.1 May 2025 31 - Inclusive Construction Practices, 7 - Responsible Construction Practices Responsible Construction Practices, High Quality Staff Support
The requirement for responsible parties to conduct a needs analysis has been waived if the physical and mental health programmes implemented are from the NZGBC suggested list.
However, if issues outside of the provided list are used, a needs analysis justifying the inclusion of the issue must be provided.
Additionally, two new issues have been added to the list of issues that may be considered include:
  • Financial literacy
  • Sustainable procurement
Meeting air tightness testing targets Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 3 - Verification and Handover
Project teams failing to meet the air tightness targets set for the project when targeting the Verification and Handover credit from Green Star Buildings at the Certified stage still meet the requirements of the Minimum Expectation. For any testing conducted, documentation of deficiencies (including results below targets) should be distributed to the project team, included in the commissioning report, and signed off by the design team.
The intention of target setting is to ensure that air tightness is considered meaningfully in the project during design and construction and is properly integrated into the commissioning process. Project teams should ensure that targets set during this process are reasonable and relevant to the project design and its intended performance.
At the Certified stage, projects are to provide evidence of their performance against the set air tightness goals. Where these targets are not achieved, project teams are encouraged to communicate with the building owner and address any discrepancies as far as practically possible as part of the commissioning process and review the design to note any lessons learnt for future projects.
Please note that final air tightness test results should be incorporated into energy models as per Credit 22: Energy Use – Reference Building Pathway
Formaldehyde testing methods Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1, DABv1.1 June 2025 13 - Indoor Pollutants, 13 - Exposure to Toxins Indoor Pollutants
Formaldehyde testing methods are updated to include those outlined in updated standards, including:
- AS/NZS 2269:2004, testing procedure AS/NZS 2098.11:2005 (R2016) Methods of test for veneer and plywood - Part 11: Determination of formaldehyde emissions for plywood.
- AS/NZS 4266.1:2017 and AS/NZS 4266.1:2017 Amd 1:2021.
 
LCA - GFA Technical Clarification DABv1.1 July 2025 19 - Life Cycle Assessment/Impacts Life Cycle Impacts, Upfront Carbon Reduction – Absolute Pathway, Upfront Carbon Reduction – Reference Pathway

For credit 19 in Design and As-Built v1.0 and v1.1, as well as Life Cycle Impacts and Upfront Carbon Emissions credits in Green Star Buildings, the definition of Gross Floor Area must be based on the New Zealand Property Institute Measurement for Rentable Areas. This means covered car-parks (included within the drip line of the building) must be included in the definition of GFA.

Air tightness General Green Star Buildings NZ July 2025 3 - Verification and Handover Commissioning and Tuning

The primary difference between ATTMA TSL2 Issue 1 and 2 is the change from being based on EN13829:2001 to ISO 9972 as well as Issue 2 improving the explanation of building envelope area, introducing co-pressurization for building extensions, adding clarity on test procedures (especially when multiple tubes are used in tall buildings). Issue 2 may be used in all cases. 

Third-party certification for Formaldehyde testing Technical Clarification Green Star Buildings NZ, DABv1.1, DABv1 July 2025 13 - Indoor Pollutants, 13 - Exposure to Toxins Engineering Wood Products

A signed and current certificate from a JAS-ANZ accredited third-party certifier, stating that a product complies with the relevant AS/NZS standards in the submission guidelines and confirming test results meet E1, E0 or Super E0, is acceptable evidence of compliance with formaldehyde emission limits of plywood, particle board, MDF, and LVL.


The relevant standards are as follows:
Product & Standard(s)
Plywood - AS/NZS 2269:2004, AS/NZS 2269:2008, AS/NZS 2269:2012
Particle Board - AS/NZS 1859.1:2004, AS/NZS 1859.1:2017
Medium Density Fibreboard (MDF) - AS/NZS 1859.2:2004, AS/NZS 1859.2:2017
Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) - AS/NZS 4357.4:2005