Skip to content
About us
Get to know the New Zealand Green Building Council
Membership
Meet and join our community
Our network for students and young professionals
News and advocacy
Keep up to date
Green buildings
Getting started
Certify a commercial building project
Certify a community development
Certify a building's operational performance
Operate at Net Zero
Green homes
Certify the design and construction of a new home
Improve your existing home
Training and events
Upcoming events
Professional development
Cart
Find a professional
Login
Search

Search

Popular Content
Architect and biomaterial expert Maria Walker named Future Thinker of the Year for 2023
Future Thinkers Circularity Panel Discussion

 Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings

Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.  

There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:

General Clarifications

These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or 
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.

Project Specific Clarifications

These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special 
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building. 

Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to 
explain why and how it applies. You can download the Technical Question form here

How to most efficiently use this page:

  1. Filter for the relevant tool version
  2. If known, use the credit name field to search for credit keywords or corresponding credit number - please note, this field will ONLY search the "Credit Name" field
  3. Use your CTRL+F to search keywords on the page
Technical Question Title Clarification Type Tool Version Month Released Credit Name Sub-credit Name Amendment/Approved Ruling
Intumescent paint General DABv1, INTv1 April 2019 13 - Indoor Pollutants Paints, Adhesives, Sealants and Carpets

The NZGBC acknowledges that the application of intumescent paint prior to weatherproofing may reduce the exposure of VOCs on a project however this is not sufficient reason for the paint to be excluded from this credit. The intent of credit 13.1 Paints, Adhesives, and Sealants is to reward project teams that demonstrate;
• No paints, adhesives, sealants or carpets are used in the nominated spaces; OR
• At least 95% of all internally applied paints, adhesives, sealants (by volume) or carpets (by area) meet the total VOC limits specified in 13.1.1 and 13.1.2 as applicable. Where exterior grade products are used in an internal application then these must also meet the requirements of the VOC limits specified in the Green Star - Design & As Built v1.2 Submission Guidelines. It is recommended that intumescent paint should be classified under the following category, which has a limit of 250g/l TVOC:
• Acoustic sealants, architectural sealant, waterproofing membranes and sealant, fire retardant sealants and adhesives.
Independent Commissioning Agent General DABv1, INTv1 November 2019 2 - Commissioning and Tuning Independent Commissioning Agent NZGBC would expect that an Independent Commissioning Agent (ICA) will have been appointed to advise, monitor, and verify the commissioning and tuning of the nominated building systems (at the very latest) from the beginning of the detailed design phase/ end of developed design phase onwards and through tender, construction, commissioning and tuning phases. This will allow the ICA to understand the design and make suggestions without overly complicating the agreed concept, preliminary and initial developed design phases. However, there is nothing to prevent the ICA from being engaged even earlier to ensure any potential issues are highlighted as soon as possible.
Compliance Verification Summary Project Specific DABv1 July 2020 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste Reporting Accuracy

Where waste contractors or waste processing facilities do not hold a ‘Compliance Verification Summary’ (as explained in the credit criteria) they shall, at a minimum, disclose to the project team how much of the Reporting Criteria has been implemented. The 'Disclosure Statement' will take place of the ‘Compliance Verification Summary’ in the project team's submission.
They can be found here: https://new.gbca.org.au/construction-and-demolition-waste/

It is expected waste contractors or waste processing facilities will fill out the form in good faith and will show how they will be fully compliant with the Criteria within 12 months. If the waste contractors or waste processing facilities does not provide evidence of complying with the criteria or how the outstanding requirements will be complied within this timeline, the credit will not be awarded. Can we please have confirmation of which party(ies), in the waste process are included in the requirement to complete ‘Disclosure statements’ as mentioned above; Waste Contractors will collect waste from site and sort this at their own facility however they may only process some of the waste – eg cardboard, soft plastics and transport other waste types such as Metals, plasterboard, timber, glass, hardfill to a number of other waste processing facilities.
Contamination and Hazardous Material General DABv1 June 2019 24 - Sustainable Sites To be eligible for these points, the site should be initially precluded by either the NES (National Environmental Standard) or the regional authority rules for its intended use before the best practice remediation takes place. Supporting evidence needs to clearly document the contamination present on the site and confirm which rules or standards precluded this development for the intended use prior to remediation.
12.3 - Views General DABv1, INTv1 May 2019 12 - Visual Comfort Views

The external 8 meters sight line is required to be entirely within the legal site boundary of project and/or open public spaces and cannot extend into adjacent sites. For precinct developments, the compliance of this credit will be assessed on a case by case basis.
Heat Rejection - Potable Water Reduction General DABv1 November 2019 18 - Potable Water, 27 - Microbial Control Heat Rejection For credit 18B.3 Heat Rejection a 90% reduction in the potable water used for heat rejection meets the credit aim. Evidence of 90% or greater potable water saving with a wet/dry cooler should be provided in order to be awarded 2 points via the prescriptive pathway. This could take the form of a manufacturer-provided calculation for the specified equipment in the project climate zone (using NIWA data). As this would need to be done as part of showing the savings this shouldn’t be an additional calculation.
Service Risers - ADF General DABv1, INTv1 July 2020 0 - General, 13 - Indoor Pollutants Indoor Pollutants, General Service risers should be entered into “Tertiary Spaces” part of the Area Definition form. Although these areas are non-habitable spaces, they should still be entered as a Tertiary Space, so they are captured under Credit 13 for Indoor Pollutants. This is because the requirement for Credit 13 is that all on site applications of paints, adhesives and sealants including both exposed and concealed applications are included in this credit.
2.1 Environmental Performance Targets DABv1, DABv1.1, Green Star Buildings NZ May 2025 2 - Commissioning and Tuning, 3 - Verification and Handover Environmental Performance targets

TC for credit 2.1.1 Environmental Performance Targets (Design & As Built v1.1) and credit 3 Environmental Performance Targets and Information (Buildings):

This credit requires the design team to define the environmental performance targets (EPT) for the project based on the design. As part of this, they must outline the operational and maintenance requirements specific to achieving the performance targets. Energy or water use are not just defined by the way the building and its systems are built, but by how those systems are operated and maintained.
This document is expected to be initiated in the early stages of design. If the decision to target Green Star certification occurs late in design, then the EPT document should be prepared as soon as possible after that decision is confirmed. If the decision to target Green Star occurs after the design stage is complete the project team should submit an eligibility TQ to the NZGBC. This document is expected to be a live document during the design process, being finalised at the end of the design stage.
The document required for this credit is intended to be useful to the project and not just created for the purpose of achieving Green Star compliance. This should be considered when writing the document by the design team.
The purpose of the credit is to provide a record of the intent of the design (design narrative and rationale) and expected operational and maintenance requirements. It is also intended to show how the performance targets are metered and can be monitored. This record can then be used:
  • To help the Client understand what has been designed, how it responds to their expectations and what the ongoing requirements for the systems will be.
  • During construction to understand if any changes to the systems selection or design could create a deviation away from the environmental performance targets.
  • To identify whether the built systems align with the design and if not enable the deviation to be identified. For example, has the system been set up to operate as it was intended?
  • By the fine-tuning team during the tuning period so they can check meter readings against the relevant environmental performance budget. Also, to assist them with understanding why an energy, water or IEQ target is not being achieved. Is it a result of a deviation in operational expectations, or is a maintenance activity required to correct the performance issue?
  • By the FM to understand the design intent of the systems and if necessary, assist with performance monitoring. For example, where a building owner commits to environmental performance monitoring under credit 5.1(DABv1.1). Any built deviations to the systems would need to be identified to enable the document to be useful. These built deviations are not expected to be recorded in the document for credit 2.1.1 (DABv1.1).
This document should not be made up of spec clauses as these do not describe the design intent required for the credit. Design parameters may be copied from the specs however, for example, the design conditions for the HVAC system.
The operational requirements in the document provided for this credit should include both automatic and manual control of the system, including efficient use. As an example of efficient use, for a lighting system:
  • Setting up time clock control to meet the working hours of the users.
  • Enabling occupancy sensor control when the lighting time clock control is manually overridden to ensure the lighting will turn off automatically when the space is not occupied.
  • Ensuring the occupancy sensor control only controls the lighting zone in its vicinity, not a larger area or the whole floor.
  • Ensuring the occupants understand how the lighting can be used efficiently including minimising manual control, turning the lighting back on to automatic control when manual control is no longer required. Clear guidance to be recorded in the Building User Guide.
The maintenance requirements in this document are expected to be outlined. They should include consideration of performance maintenance, not just preventative or routine maintenance requirements. Detailed maintenance procedures are not required only a list of maintenance activities, frequency, and troubleshooting. The purpose of recording this information in this document is to communicate to the building owner the extent of operations and maintenance requirements there will be for the selected systems. 

An example is provided below.

Maintenance activity

Frequency

Indication maintenance might be required

Replace filter

Every 12 months

·        Dirty filters can cause an increase in energy use of the HVAC system and/or a decrease in the air flow from the unit.

·        The filter may be visibly dirty or grey.

·        Dust may have accumulated around vents.

For the targets, metering and monitoring part of the EPT documentation:

 

DABv1.1

Buildings

At Design Review stage

Credit 6 not being targeted – EPT document should contain the metering and monitoring information for credit 2.1.1.

 

Credit 6 being targeted – the EPT document can reference the Monitoring Strategy developed for credit 6 if this is available at Design stage otherwise is required to contain the metering and monitoring information for credit 2.1.1.

EPT document can reference the Monitoring Strategy to avoid replication of information. Any information not covered by the Monitoring Strategy but required under ‘Environmental Performance Targets and Information’ in the SG should be included in the EPT document. If the Monitoring Strategy is not yet available then the EPT document must contain all targets, metering and monitoring information required under ‘Environmental Performance Targets and Information’ in the SG.

At As Built stage

Credit 6 not being targeted – EPT document should contain the metering and monitoring information for credit 2.1.1.

 

Credit 6 being targeted – the EPT should reference the Monitoring Strategy developed for credit 6.

 

Note that where projects go through Design Review assessment with a compliant EPT document, no further updates to this document would be required at the As Built stage.  

EPT document should identify the targets but can reference the Monitoring Strategy also required for credit 3 to avoid replication of information.

 

Note that where projects go through Design Review assessment with a compliant EPT document, no further updates to this document would be required at the As Built stage.  

 

For DABv1.1 projects only:
Where a Monitoring Strategy is not available or inadequate (DABv1.1 only and only at design stage as per the above table) the EPT document should clearly include a sufficient description of the metering and monitoring approach. For example, including the metering diagram but also including an easy way for the reader to understand which meter relates to which set budget. 

As an example, this could be presented in the following way:

Energy end use

Performance target (kWh/a)

Associated meters

HVAC

12,000

CM3, CM5

 

Where CM3 and CM5 are the two meters in the building that read the HVAC energy use as identified on the meter diagram included in the document. Note that the meter numbers required in this table would be as identified on the meter diagram also provided in the document.
The breakdown of targets per system/use presented in the EPT should align with the metering breakdown. This allows these budgets to be confirmed in operation. Projects that meet the small buildings exception presented under credit 6 (DABv1.1) or credit 3 (Buildings) need only provide a single energy and single water target, rather than per system/use.
The monitoring information here is not expected to be as detailed as the TM39 monitoring strategy required for credit 6, but it should outline the process. For example, including the monitoring frequency, the process for rectification if a budget is being exceeded, who is responsible, regularity of reporting of environmental performance, and what gets reported to who.
For DABv1.1 and Buildings projects:
Fire, communication, IT, security and lift systems can be excluded from the EPT documentation.
Efficient use (DABv1.1) should detail how the automatic controls enable efficiency, but also how efficiency can be managed through manual control. Examples include:
  • Not opening windows when the mechanical ventilation is operating.
  • Setting the lighting to automatically operate during the main business hours only, with sensor controls at all other times.
  • If the automatic lighting control is overridden to turn the lighting back to the automatic system as soon as manual control is no longer needed.
External Loading Dock Glare Technical Clarification DABv1, DABv1.1 June 2024 12 - Visual Comfort Glare reduction The Guidance for Industrial Projects for DAB v1.0 and v1.1 includes "external loading dock areas" as Primary areas that are subject to the Glare Reduction credit requirements. Upon further industry consultation regarding the feasibility of meeting this requirement as well as the benefits to occupants, this requirement has been removed. External loading dock areas do not need to be included in this credit.
Nominated Building Systems Technical Clarification DABv1, DABv1.1 June 2024 2 - Commissioning and Tuning Environmental Building Performance

Nominated Building Systems: If the project team chooses not to include one of the systems listed in the Submission Guidelines, justification is to be provided why it has been excluded. The building envelope/façade does not need to be considered as part of the nominated building systems unless it includes an active component such as automated windows.