Skip to content

 Green Star Technical Clarification Rulings

Technical Clarifications for Green Star represent our answers to Technical Questions submitted by projects, and provide further guidance and reference to others. The list is regularly updated.

There are two types of Technical Clarifications listed in the table below:

General Clarifications

These are extensions to the guidance provided in the Submission Guidelines. They clarify and sometimes supersede the original Credit Criteria or 
Compliance Requirements. General Clarifications set precedent for future project teams to follow. Should a project team wish to apply a general clarification to its project, there is no requirement for further Technical Questions to be submitted. NZGBC Assessors will also use them as precedents to assess submissions.

Project Specific Clarifications

These are published as references for other projects but, unlike General Clarifications, they do not set precedent. They often relate to special 
situations where multiple prerequisites exist for a particular project and are less likely to reoccur to another project. Therefore, rulings set for Project Specific Clarifications are often conditional and will likely vary for other projects. Each project still needs to submit its own Technical Questions and provides evidence relating to its own building in order to have a similar ruling approved for that specific building. 

Should you wish to apply any Technical Clarification for legacy rating tools to your projects, please submit a Technical Question to the NZGBC to 
explain why and how it applies. You can download the Technical Question form here

Technical Question Title Clarification Type Tool Version Month Released Credit Name Sub-credit Name Amendment/Approved Ruling
Inclusion of Small-sized Natural Material as ‘Excavation Waste’ Project Specific DABv1 November 2020 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste Construction and Demolition Waste

Any natural stone or rock-like material in waste arising from excavation that is below a size that would preclude its re-use as fill, topsoil or similar re-use (in the reasonable opinion of the waste management contractor or processing facility), complies with the definition of ‘excavation waste’ under Credit 22 of the DAB Submission Guidelines

Glasshouses Project Specific DABv1, DABv1.1 August 2021 24 - Sustainable Sites Reuse of Land

This technical question for Land Reuse is accepted on the condition that the project team can provide evidence that there is a hard surface to the floor of the glasshouses, e.g. concrete, which is not suitable for planting and/or the ground is not suitable for growing food crops. Alternatively, the project team may wish to consider the relocation of the glasshouse to another site not previously used for agriculture and within the Auckland region where it will be reused for growing produce.

Complaince Using Daylight = no Simulation Software Required General DABv1 October 2019 12 - Visual Comfort Daylight
Schematic Design/Conceptual Design General DABv1 November 2020 0 - General

Where the credit refers to “Schematic Design”, this can be clarified as Concept Design or Conceptual Design which is the terminology more commonly used in New Zealand

VOC and Formaldehyde Compliance General DABv1 February 2021 13 - Indoor Pollutants Indoor Pollutants
ISO 14001 General DABv1 December 2020 7 - Responsible Construction Practices EMS
‘Warm Charging’ Technology General DABv1 May 2022 20 - Responsible Building Materials Structural and Reinforcing Steel
Example of Cement Reduction between Reference and Actual Case General DABv1 March 2020 19 - Life Cycle Assessment/Impacts Life Cycle Impacts – Concrete
Responsible Products Framework as Alternative to NZGBC’s Framework for Product Certification Scheme General DABv1.1 August 2023 21 - Sustainable Products Third Party Certification
Crushed Concrete Reused as Hardfill or Backfill (Credit 22.2B) General DABv1.1 October 2023 22 - Construction and Demolition Waste Percentage Benchmark